MBS RECAP: Coasting Out At Highs; Nothing Happened Today
By:
Matthew Graham
•
MBS Live: MBS Afternoon Market Summary
These days happen. On June 20th, there were over 2.3 million 10yr Treasury Futures contracts traded. The big nasty NFP sell-off day on July 5th garnered a still-massive 1.73 million and this last Wednesday we got our clue that we might be the only ones here this week when only 1.28 million contracts were traded (historically solid day, but not with Bernanke testimony and not in recent context). Today's total is just over 600k. So again, that's 50% of the volume of Wednesday (which was sorta lower than expected anyway) and a shockingly insignificant 26% of June 20th volume. Volume isn't everything, especially when only looking at one security, but it's enough to tell this story. Low volume trading can go either way (just like any other trading) and at its best, it simply tries to pass quietly through to more liquid future pastures. Today was quiet despite solid gains. Technical levels were tested early (just before 8am actually) and got the only real nibble of the day in terms of supportive buying. That was enough of a cue for a rally that persisted in linear fashion until the day's scheduled Fed buying in Treasuries provided the only other opportunity to any real activity. Here again, the ball bounced in our favor and 11am levels (when buying was done) ended up being 3pm levels (when most dealers mark their books for the day... 3pm-5pm trading gets pushed to the next session).
MBS Pricing Snapshot
Pricing shown below is delayed, please note the timestamp at the bottom. Real time pricing is available via MBS Live.
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Pricing as of 4:03 PM EST |
Afternoon Reprice Alerts and Updates
Below is a recap of instant Reprice Alerts and updates issued via email and text alert to MBS Live subscribers this afternoon.
11:06AM :
POMO Stands Out Amid Low Volume Range Trade. More Gains For Now
"POMO" = Permanent Open Market Operations, whereby the Fed conducts its scheduled purchases of Treasuries on a virtually daily basis. In this sense, the Fed is like the head chef at a restaurant that will have a fish special at tonight's dinner service. Primary dealers are like fishmongers bringing their catch to market for the Fed's consideration. The Fed knows about how many fish it will need for dinner service, but will buy slightly more or less depending on the selection.
This can leave some dealers with too much or too little depending on how much and from whom the Fed decides to buy. During and immediately after the buying process (from 10:15am to 11:00am most days) supply and demand fundamentals come into play where excess demand from those left without enough inventory can push prices up (and yields down), whereas excess supply left on the shelves can cause prices to be discounted (pushing yields up).
If it was just one or two fishmongers, sorting out supply/demand micro-imbalances created by the daily POMO would be very simple and cause no volatility. But the fact that there are 21 fishmongers means there is more hustle and bustle to get inventory sorted out before things start getting stinky. In general, it's slightly more common to see yields fall into and during the POMO and rise afterward, but far from guaranteed.
However, if you see a noticeable move into stronger territory during that time, a leveling-off after 11am does become more likely. Volumes have also spiked (relative to excruciatingly low volume overall) during POMO, which is another clue that this is the event being traded. None of this is of any consequence to the bigger picture and only relayed here by way of explaining the move and suggesting it might get harder to sustain the momentum starting now.
Fannie 3.5s are up 10 at 101-06 and 4.0s are up 9 at 104-03. 10yr yields are down just under 4bps on the day at 2.495.
This can leave some dealers with too much or too little depending on how much and from whom the Fed decides to buy. During and immediately after the buying process (from 10:15am to 11:00am most days) supply and demand fundamentals come into play where excess demand from those left without enough inventory can push prices up (and yields down), whereas excess supply left on the shelves can cause prices to be discounted (pushing yields up).
If it was just one or two fishmongers, sorting out supply/demand micro-imbalances created by the daily POMO would be very simple and cause no volatility. But the fact that there are 21 fishmongers means there is more hustle and bustle to get inventory sorted out before things start getting stinky. In general, it's slightly more common to see yields fall into and during the POMO and rise afterward, but far from guaranteed.
However, if you see a noticeable move into stronger territory during that time, a leveling-off after 11am does become more likely. Volumes have also spiked (relative to excruciatingly low volume overall) during POMO, which is another clue that this is the event being traded. None of this is of any consequence to the bigger picture and only relayed here by way of explaining the move and suggesting it might get harder to sustain the momentum starting now.
Fannie 3.5s are up 10 at 101-06 and 4.0s are up 9 at 104-03. 10yr yields are down just under 4bps on the day at 2.495.
Live Chat Featured Comments
A recap of the featured comments from the MBS Live Dashboard's Live Chat feature, utilized by hundreds of industry professionals each day.
Bill Laffey : "REPRICE: 2:45 PM - Cole Taylor Better"
Matthew Graham : "yep. Hard not to take it personally, but human psychology is what it is on both sides of the desk. If I thought I could get the same car for less at another dealership, it's a tough call between honor and financial sense. I don't begrudge the financial decision, but I really appreciate the honorable ones (like the few who said they could have gotten a lower rate but were sticking with me because of the time and effort I put in)."
Hugh W. Page : "MG, well said and believe me I use MBS Live every day as a tool to enhance credibility (thank you btw). What's tough is when you feel you have that connection, delivered professionalism throughout, provided great value by helping them structure the deal in a way they weren't thinking about or created great value for them and then they take your counsel to a competitor who did nothing but quote a better rate and fee structure (I assume)."
Matthew Graham : "Hugh, that whole topic quickly became part of my introductory conversation. Didn't prevent it completely, but almost. I didn't say I "expected" it, but that it would be understandable. I explained my business structure, how I got paid, how that related to rate sheets and markets, let them see a rate sheet and structure their own cost vs rate (back when you could do that), and spun the monitor with live MBS prices around saying "I watch this... Not many do. It puts me in a great position to s"
Hugh W. Page : "I don't care that you shop me, in fact I expect it. I guess I'm naive to think others will act do as I do and be courteous and professional about it. "
Jason York : "most of those deals that you lose won't come back to you simply because of embarassment, after you went on and on about how they shouldn't be surprised when things change, no one wants to admit they were wrong and they fell for it, so they just go with it"
Joe Daquino : "Depends on the client. Some people value service / reputation and some simply don't care. I got a lady who inquired with me almost a month ago and keeps asking me once a week for updated pricing on her scenario. I just sent her pricing, AGAIN, today and it is probably the best pricing I have seen since she inquired. Her response to my email today, "thanks for the response, I am still shopping around"."
Scott Valins : "for me, on deals where I'm being shopped and I can't offer the best rate it's probably less than 25% that I still will the clients biz. Maybe even lower."
Scott Valins : "survey: of the deals where you can't offer the best rate/pricing what percentage do you still end up closing due to service, reputation, other lender failed the client and they came back to you, etc? I ask b/c we always talk about how pricing isn't everything (I agree) but what do our stats say?"
Jason York : "I guess you can't fault them too much if people are willing to pay it"
Jason York : "wow, from the article: In an example of a loan on its website, CashCall says it could offer a borrower $2,525 to be paid back in 47 installments at an annual interest rate of 184 percent."
Mike Walker : "Here's an article on it http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-05-31/the-subprime-money-behind-a-winning-horse"
Joe Moran : "the guy that started cashcall is the same one that started ditech and sold it GMAC for gazillions. "
David Doerr : "I thought the money behind Cash Call was an old SubPrime Lender"
Victor Burek : "REPRICE: 1:02 PM - Plaza Better"
Nate Miller : "REPRICE: 12:30 PM - Caliber Funding Better"
Scott Valins : "REPRICE: 12:24 PM - Fifth Third Mortgage Better"
Eric Franson : "REPRICE: 12:23 PM - Wells Fargo Better"
Read what our user's have to say about MBS Live on LinkedIn.
» Start a two week free trial of MBS Live.