MBS MID-DAY: On The Mend After Morning Sell-Off
Most of the pertinent details of the morning have been covered in the previous 'special alert.' The recap below fills in the blanks with more specific detail on the now irrelevant overnight session as well as some of the bullet points on the data. To recap the recap, this morning's big nasty swing was all about Chicago PMI. Well, nothing is ever really "ALL about" anything when it comes to markets, but that data was the trigger point for the sell-off. The EXTENT of the sell-off is something that relied on all the other considerations in play. Chief among them would be the ongoing establishment of a pre-NFP range that we've been discussing since Wednesday morning. That range would have been widened or shifted away from neutrality if we'd broken below the 2.07/2.09 gap seen in this morning's Treasury chart. That's a very important gap, and importantly, it's been very soundly rejected with this morning's move. This maintains the sideways trend between 2.17 and 2.07 heading into NFP without yet giving any hints of consolidation (trading range forms a triangle) or trend (trading range tilts higher or lower)
Since the sell-off, MBS have ground back a few ticks and are into the 100-20's currently. 10's tested 2.17 repeatedly and have since ebbed lower into the 2.15's. So far, we're setting up for an afternoon that looks to be far less eventful than most recent Friday afternoons thanks to the morning sell-off and decent show of support. That's little consolation for the damage done to rate sheets, but (fingers crossed) it could make for a less stressful reprice risk situation in the PM hours.
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Pricing as of 11:09 AM EST |
- Current Conditions 98.0 vs 96.0
- expectations 75.8 vs 74.7
- Index highest since July 2007, Conditions highest since August 2007
market reaction: This report itself wasn't a big enough beat to justify major damage to bond markets, but it did step aside for the momentum already in place following Chicago PMI. It may have added to it slightly.
From Reuters:
Greater optimism over the economic outlook and personal finances in the midst of record stock market prices pushed U.S. consumer sentiment to its highest level in nearly six years in May, a survey released on Friday showed. While upper income households continued to set the pace, confidence also began to improve among middle and lower income households in the latter part of the month. Wealthier households are more likely to be invested in equities and reap the benefits of this year's sharp stock market rally. The Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan's final reading on the overall index on consumer sentiment rose to 84.5 from 76.4 in April. It was the highest level since July 2007. The report topped expectations for 83.7, which was May's preliminary figure earlier in the month.
- Prices Paid 55.3 vs 51.0
- Employment Index 56.9 vs 48.7
- Production 62.7 vs 49.9
- PMI and Production both highest since March 2012
Market Reaction: 3 alerts are out on this already. Fair to say "reaction=bad for bond markets
The Chicago Purchasing Managers reported April's Chicago Business Barometer sprung 9.7 to 58.7, the highest since March 2012 and in sharp contrast to April's 3-1/2 year low. All Business Activity measures surged in May, reversing weakness seen in most categories in March and April.
Consumer Sentiment had a chance to kick the selling into high gear or to suggest moderation. 2.17% was likely to be the scene of the next "test" for 10yr yields and the moderately bullish data was enough to get us there, but not to break through. 10's are currently around 2.16, but trading is active and it's too soon to know whether we're looking at a consolidation for what will be a bigger move into weaker territory, or if 2.17 has indeed held its ground as a supportive ceiling. Hoping for the latter, obviously, as it suggests better prospects for MBS ground-holding.
Speaking of MBS, Fannie 3.0s are down 13 ticks now to 100-20, but quotes and trades are whipping around violently. 4 ticks in either direction is possible in mere seconds. Negative reprices are likely from any lenders who were out with pricing before 9:42am.
Reprice risk has gone from "maybe" to "likely" for any lenders out with pricing already during the course of typing these words. More to follow as we learn more.
In terms of flows, the overnight session was the lightest of the week, and buyers were in control (yields lower) in both Asian and European sessions. Recently, US Treasuries have been increasingly resigned to simply tie themselves to the back of movement in Yen and Japanese Bonds at the start of the overnight session, and hop over to German Bunds during the second half before domestic market participants take things in the direction THEY want to take them.
One great recent example of this was where Japan took US 10yr yields up to 2.235 overnight (5/29), yet we opened under 2.17. Last night was no different but in reverse this time (and with smaller swings). 10's made it down to the terrifyingly important pivot point at 2.07 and bounced hard around the 6am hour (here's the "technical" component to the "tradeflows and technicals"). We've been trending into weaker territory ever since and Consumer Spending data did relatively nothing to stop it.
All that having been said, the overnight gains were sufficient, and the counter-trend weak enough that we're still in positive territory. Fannie 3.0s are 4 ticks higher on the day at 101-05 and 10's are about 2bps lower at 2.10. As expected, month-end buying has been lighter than historically normal and the fear is that continues to be the case through the close.
Tradeflows aside, data matters, and we're going to get the last two big reports of the week at 9:45 with Chicago PMI at 9:45 and Consumer Sentiment at 9:55am. Both have movement potential (keep in mind that Chi-PMI will cause a big swing at 9:42am if it's going to come in far away from consensus).
- First decline since May 2012
- Income +0.0 vs +0.1 forecast
- PCE Prices +0.0 vs +0.1 forecast
- Market Reaction: very slight, very brief positivity and now back to pre-data levels. Next!
Personal income decreased $5.6 billion, or less than 0.1 percent, and disposable personal income (DPI) decreased $16.1 billion, or 0.1 percent, in April, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Personal consumption expenditures (PCE) decreased $20.5 billion, or 0.2 percent. In March, personal income increased $36.2 billion, or 0.3 percent, DPI increased $25.4 billion, or 0.2 percent, and PCE increased $14.2 billion, or 0.1 percent, based on revised estimates.
Personal outlays -- PCE, personal interest payments, and personal current transfer payments -- decreased $21.7 billion in April, in contrast to an increase of $16.4 billion in March. PCE decreased $20.5 billion, in contrast to an increase of $14.2 billion.