MBS RECAP: 3/20/2012
By:
Matthew Graham
•
MBS Live: MBS RECAP
Open MBS Live Dashboard | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Pricing as of 3:58 PM EST |
Afternoon Market Updates
A recap of MBS Market Updates provided by MND Analysts and streamed live to the MBS Live Dashboard.
2:01PM :
ALERT:
Bond Markets Fighting. Reprices Still Likely, Maybe Less Ugly
Lots of alerts, I know, but figured you'd rather have the play by play if you're in the field today...
Big volume sellers brought on the test of 2.40 in 10yr Treasuries, but bigger volume buying held the line. The highest tick we got in cash 10's was 2.399.
MBS are just watching and reacting, and as 10's have bounced down to 2.3845, MBS have rebounded to 101-24, still in negative territory, but not as scary as before. Negative reprices are still very possible, but the "ugliness" mentioned in the last alert should be mitigated somewhat by bond markets' willingness to put up some sort of fight at current levels.
Big volume sellers brought on the test of 2.40 in 10yr Treasuries, but bigger volume buying held the line. The highest tick we got in cash 10's was 2.399.
MBS are just watching and reacting, and as 10's have bounced down to 2.3845, MBS have rebounded to 101-24, still in negative territory, but not as scary as before. Negative reprices are still very possible, but the "ugliness" mentioned in the last alert should be mitigated somewhat by bond markets' willingness to put up some sort of fight at current levels.
1:48PM :
ALERT:
Further Deterioration... Decidedly In The Red Now...
Scary levels for Fannie 3.5's and 10yr yields alive. The former just broke a few ticks below the old "concrete floor" level from November 2011 at 101-25 and is currently at 101-22. The latter looks determined to test 2.40 and higher. Unless something changes right now, and in a big way, reprices are highly likely, and they will be ugly.
1:27PM :
ALERT:
Negative Reprice Risk Returns as MBS Approach Unchanged Levels
Depending on when you glance at prices, they may or may not be in the red, but both Fannie 3.5's and 4.0's have returned to levels close enough to unchanged on the day that risks of reprices for the worse are probably are more pronounced than they were at last check.
MBS are paying some sort of attention to Treasuries here, looking for some guidance on what has turned out, thus far, to be the slowest and most range-contained trading day of the multi-day bond market beating. The latter are attempting to hold their ground at 2.375 with questionable success. The more questionable and less successful they are, the tougher things may get for MBS and the more likely reprices may become. We wouldn't rule out a reprice from one of the "early crowd" even now, but aren't running for the bomb cellar just yet.
Fannie 3.5's are 1 tick in the green at the moment at 101-25 and 4.0's are unchanged on the day at 104-06.
MBS are paying some sort of attention to Treasuries here, looking for some guidance on what has turned out, thus far, to be the slowest and most range-contained trading day of the multi-day bond market beating. The latter are attempting to hold their ground at 2.375 with questionable success. The more questionable and less successful they are, the tougher things may get for MBS and the more likely reprices may become. We wouldn't rule out a reprice from one of the "early crowd" even now, but aren't running for the bomb cellar just yet.
Fannie 3.5's are 1 tick in the green at the moment at 101-25 and 4.0's are unchanged on the day at 104-06.
12:10PM :
ALERT:
MBS Tentatively Creep Back Into Positive Territory
This alert serves to unwind some of the more serious risks of negative reprices on the earlier weakness, taking us back to more neutral territory at the moment. Although we did indeed get two reports of negative reprices, there were flags on those plays due to "late hist." In other words, the negative reprices came out when MBS Prices were already in the process of bouncing back.
Whether or not they continue to bounce back is not the sort of thing we're comfortable trying to predict, but we'd generally view negative reprices as less of a risk if Fannie 3.5's are trading over 101-29 and as more of a risk if they're trading below 101-26. The zone in between is uncertain and would have much to do with lender-specific considerations and initial rate-sheet timing.
To be clear, negative reprice risk is not completely gone, but somewhat decreased while 3.5's and 4.0's are trading at or above current levels (101-28 for 3.5's and 104-08 for 4.0's. Yeah.... I said 4.0's.... )
Whether or not they continue to bounce back is not the sort of thing we're comfortable trying to predict, but we'd generally view negative reprices as less of a risk if Fannie 3.5's are trading over 101-29 and as more of a risk if they're trading below 101-26. The zone in between is uncertain and would have much to do with lender-specific considerations and initial rate-sheet timing.
To be clear, negative reprice risk is not completely gone, but somewhat decreased while 3.5's and 4.0's are trading at or above current levels (101-28 for 3.5's and 104-08 for 4.0's. Yeah.... I said 4.0's.... )
11:07AM :
ALERT:
Bond Markets Weaken Following Fed Buying. Some Reprice Risk
Caveat: scheduled Fed "Twist" buying is a way of life these days and we often see brief examples of whipsaw volatility with rates ultimately settling into similar levels as seen before the buying. But we're cognizant, at the moment, that lenders are especially sensitive to various bouts of selling, especially if those take prices to the lowest levels of the day.
With the highest volume of the day, bond markets moved to their weakest levels after the details of today's round of Twist buying were announced. Negative reprice risk is increasing and we wouldn't be surprised to see a few of the "early crowd" come in with a reprice here, assuming they were out with rates before 8am.
With the highest volume of the day, bond markets moved to their weakest levels after the details of today's round of Twist buying were announced. Negative reprice risk is increasing and we wouldn't be surprised to see a few of the "early crowd" come in with a reprice here, assuming they were out with rates before 8am.
Featured Market Discussion
A recap of the featured comments from the Live Discussion on the MBS Live Dashboard.
Ray Pearsall : "REPRICE: 3:31 PM - Franklin American Worse"
Steve Chizmadia : "REPRICE: 3:31 PM - Pinnacle Worse"
Matt Sullivan : "REPRICE: 3:12 PM - Fifth Third Mortgage Worse"
Steve Chizmadia : "PRMG- Worse"
Michael Tadros : "REPRICE: 2:16 PM - Suntrust Worse"
Michael Tadros : "REPRICE: 2:15 PM - Flagstar Worse"
Andy Pada : "REPRICE: 2:00 PM - BB&T Worse"
Tom Bartlett : "REPRICE: 1:59 PM - 360 Mortgage Worse"
Tom Bartlett : "REPRICE: 1:57 PM - Stearns Lending Worse"
Eric Franson : "REPRICE: 12:02 PM - Wells Fargo Worse"
Jeff Anderson : "REPRICE: 11:53 AM - Chase Worse"
Matthew Graham : "ebbs and flows.... just bigger this time"
Matthew Graham : "but in having an open discourse about how such a level could logically fit within a technical framework, we rob it of some of it's "end of the world" appeal, and further reinforce the broader trend which has resistance that still hasn't crossed above 2% yet."
Matthew Graham : "the highest of these lines hooks up those October highs with August highs and deposits us in the 2.58 neigborhood this month. aka, mg's "armageddon line""
Matthew Graham : "There's a lot of good "behavior" from a technical standpoint long those lines as well as lines that lie parallel to them"
Jeff Anderson : "This all sounds very familiar."
Matthew Graham : "Additionally, the yield lows from sept/oct hook up with the yield lows from Dec-Mar in such a way as to form a gently sloped uptrend in yields. you may remember the teal "counterattack" lines that have been on many 2012 charts on the blog."
Matt Hodges : "for example, Santelli threw out 2.50, without any real thought about the number"
Matthew Graham : "so many people are saying 2.40 that I wouldn't be surprised to see things go higher, even if I'm not necessarily expecting it."
Matthew Graham : "first... I'm always skeptical about "calls" that seem so universal."
Andy Pada : "ruh roh"
Matthew Graham : "there's a "but" though...."
Matthew Graham : "to be clear, most everyone who mentions 2.4 is referring in fact to 2.42, which was the 10/28/11 high."
Matthew Graham : "Jeff Anderson will tell you, every time I said something about the "broader range" as we kept bumping our head against 2.08-ish in early Feb, he'd ask me, "so if this isn't a range break, what's the broader range?" I'd always say something like "you won't like my answer..." which was usually some combination of intermediate pivot points at 2.13, 2.2's, and always ending in 2.4"
Andy Pada : "So you consider us in the range? What is the range?"
Matthew Graham : "pretty dramatic move, but exactly to the range boundary. it's very interesting"
Gus Floropoulos : "pretty dramatic move though"
Matthew Graham : "I can' remember where I read it, but I remember thinking the reasoning sounded good at the time that a QE3 was most likely in, well, Q3 (as in the third quarter)."
Matthew Graham : "I think it plays a role, but unlike Fisher said yesterday, I don't think it's simply off the table."
Matthew Graham : "I think i'd attribute less of the sell-off to lack of recent QE3 verbiage than I feel like I'm hearing on CNBC, and reading on various reputable financial websites and newswires"
Andy Pada : "MG, how much would you attribute the selloff to the lack of language for QE3?"