OCC Issues Interim Report on Servicer Compliance with Consent Orders
The Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has reported on the actions taken by 12 servicers to comply with consent order issued in April to correct deficient and unsafe or unsound foreclosure processes and actions taken related to the independent foreclosure review announced by OCC, the Federal Reserve, and the Office of Thrift Supervision earlier this month. The twelve servicers covered by the OCC and OTC's portion of the action are Bank of America, Citibank, HSBC, JPMorgan Chase, MetLife Bank, PNC, U.S. Bank, Wells Fargo, Aurora Bank, FSB; EverBank (and the thrift holding company, EverBank Financial Corp.); OneWest Bank, FSB (and its holding company IMB HoldCo LLC); and Sovereign Bank.
Tuesday's report, Interim Status Report: Foreclosure-Related Consent Orders identifies the independent consultants retained by the servicers to conduct file reviews (under the direction of OCC) for borrowers requesting redress. According to the report, work is underway on actions to comply with the consent orders with efforts to correct deficiencies in foreclosure processes management oversight, and internal audit the most advanced. An integrated claims processor has begun mailing letters to borrowers who were in any stage of foreclosure between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010 to inform them of the process for requesting reviews of their cases if they believe they suffered financial injury through servicer misfeasance. Outreach will also be made to borrowers using such methods as mass media advertising in national publication such as People, and TV guide, online marketing, social media marketing, media news coverage, and outreach to community groups.
In addition to the reviews of borrow claims, a "look-back" review will be undertaken, sampling to identify files for a review which is intended to further identify servicer deficiencies, errors, or misrepresentations that may have caused financial injury. This review will look at such information as whether the foreclosing party had properly documented ownership or was otherwise a proper party to the action; whether a foreclosure may have taken place while a modification was underway, or whether fees were improperly charged. Results of the sampling may lead to more in depth reviews.
Under the consent order servicers were required to submit plans for correcting deficiencies in a number of servicing areas, address their use of MERS, manage third parties, and correct other operational difficulties. Those plans have been submitted at various times over the last few months. Plans to correct servicing deficiencies include such measures ensuring that loss mitigation staff routinely communicate with staff processing foreclosures; that deadlines for responding to communication from borrowers and for making loan modifications requests be met; that there is a reliable single point of contact for each borrower and that be identified in writing; and that staff is trained adequately to handle delinquencies, loss mitigation and loan modifications. Other factors included in the plan include procedures and controls to ensure that a loan is protected from "dual tracking", i.e., that a loan approved for modification is pulled from foreclosure proceedings; and that payments are promptly and properly credited;
Plans addressing oversight of third-party service establish processes for appropriate due diligence in evaluating the qualifications of potential third-party service providers before entering into new contractual arrangements, provide for regular, periodic reviews of third-party service providers and assessment of their performance based on qualitative standards for competence, completeness, and legal compliance rather than standards based solely on the volume of foreclosures processed or the speed of processing. Additionally, the plans provide for the secure custody and accuracy of records transferred to these third parties during the foreclosure process.
Other plans ensure appropriate oversight and controls of servicer activities with respect to MERS and compliance with MERSCORP's membership rules, terms, and conditions These plans include enhancing controls and standardizing processes for executing mortgage assignments by MERS certifying officers, improving processes for controlling data quality, and establishing periodic-in some cases daily-reconciliations of key reports and data to ensure compliance with MERS requirements and prompt resolution of discrepancies.
Other plans address improving the management information systems that support servicing and foreclosure processing, assessing risks posed by servicer operations, and setting up compliance committees responsible for the development and implementation of compliance programs, action plans, policies and procedures, and strengthened operating processes to correct the deficiencies cited by the enforcement actions
While much of the work to correct identified weaknesses in policies, operating procedures, control functions and audit processes will be substantially complete in the first part of 2012, other longer term initiatives will continue through the balance of 2012. Actions and progress vary by servicer. OCC examiners continue to provide ongoing oversight of activities to ensure compliance with the consent orders.