Fed Makes No Mention of MBS Sales. FOMC Statement a Non-Event
The Federal Open Market Committee today released their monetary policy statement.
From the Federal Reserve website:
The Federal Reserve System, often referred to as the Federal Reserve or simply "the Fed," is the central bank of the United States. It was created by Congress to provide the nation with a safer, more flexible, and more stable monetary and financial system. Over the years, its role has evolved and expanded.
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is the monetary policymaking body of the Federal Reserve System. It is responsible for formulation of a monetary policy designed to promote economic growth, full employment, stable prices, and a sustainable pattern of international trade and payments.
The Federal Open Market Committee consists of twelve voting members: the seven members of the Board of Governors and five of the twelve Federal Reserve Bank presidents. The president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York serves on a continuous basis; the presidents of the other Reserve Banks serve one-year terms on a rotating basis beginning on January 1 of each year.
READ MORE ABOUT THE FUNCTIONS OF THE FED
Below is a summary of additions, alterations, and adjustments the FOMC made to their latest monetary policy statement.
Highlight #1 is a modest upgrade to the labor market outlook. A positive overall but the Fed is still cautiously optimistic about job creation...as illustrated by their logic behind barriers to growth in household spending
Highlight #2 doesn't tell us anything new because the verbiage is essentially the same, plus spending is still constrained by the same factors.
Highlight #3 is nothing new to real estate and mortgage professionals. Housing has shown signs of improvement as the April 30 homebuyer tax credit deadline has approached. Whether or not housing can prove it has stabilized is yet to be seen. READ MORE
Highlight #4 is the removal of asset purchase plan guidance. This was an administrative update, the MBS purchase program is over. The Fed did however remind us that they are still standing at the ready to come to the rescue of a market in need of liquidity.
Highlight #5 is a little added clarity from the lone FOMC dissenter, Thomas Hoenig. Basically what Hoenig is saying is the market is becoming too reliant on artificial support which may end up limiting the Fed's ability to fight inflation down the road.
Plain and Simple: As expected, the Fed made no mention of selling their mortgage-backed securities portfolio, the "extended period" verbiage was left in place, and inflation is still seen at acceptable levels (dovish tone). Overall...this FOMC meeting turned out to be a non-event.
Press Release
Federal Reserve Press Release
Release Date: April 28, 2010
Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in March suggests that economic activity has continued to strengthen and that the labor market is beginning to improve. Growth in household spending has picked up recently but remains constrained by high unemployment, modest income growth, lower housing wealth, and tight credit. Business spending on equipment and software has risen significantly; however, investment in nonresidential structures is declining and employers remain reluctant to add to payrolls. Housing starts have edged up but remain at a depressed level. While bank lending continues to contract, financial market conditions remain supportive of economic growth. Although the pace of economic recovery is likely to be moderate for a time, the Committee anticipates a gradual return to higher levels of resource utilization in a context of price stability.
With substantial resource slack continuing to restrain cost pressures and longer-term inflation expectations stable, inflation is likely to be subdued for some time.
The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and continues to anticipate that economic conditions, including low rates of resource utilization, subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period. The Committee will continue to monitor the economic outlook and financial developments and will employ its policy tools as necessary to promote economic recovery and price stability.
In light of improved functioning of financial markets, the Federal Reserve has closed all but one of the special liquidity facilities that it created to support markets during the crisis. The only remaining such program, the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, is scheduled to close on June 30 for loans backed by new-issue commercial mortgage-backed securities; it closed on March 31 for loans backed by all other types of collateral.
Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; James Bullard; Elizabeth A. Duke; Donald L. Kohn; Sandra Pianalto; Eric S. Rosengren; Daniel K. Tarullo; and Kevin M. Warsh. Voting against the policy action was Thomas M. Hoenig, who believed that continuing to express the expectation of exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period was no longer warranted because it could lead to a build-up of future imbalances and increase risks to longer run macroeconomic and financial stability, while limiting the Committee’s flexibility to begin raising rates modestly.
Release Date: March 16, 2010
Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in
January suggests that economic activity has continued to strengthen and
that the labor market
is stabilizing. Household spending is expanding at
a moderate rate but remains constrained by high
unemployment, modest
income growth, lower housing wealth, and tight credit. Business spending
on equipment and software has risen significantly. However, investment
in nonresidential structures is declining, housing starts have been flat
at a depressed level, and employers remain reluctant to
add to
payrolls. While bank lending continues to contract, financial market
conditions remain supportive of economic growth. Although the pace of
economic recovery is likely to be moderate for a time, the Committee
anticipates a gradual return to higher levels of resource utilization in
a context of price stability.
With substantial resource slack continuing to restrain cost pressures and longer-term inflation expectations stable, inflation is likely to be subdued for some time.
The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and continues to anticipate that economic conditions, including low rates of resource utilization, subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period. To provide support to mortgage lending and housing markets and to improve overall conditions in private credit markets, the Federal Reserve has been purchasing $1.25 trillion of agency mortgage-backed securities and about $175 billion of agency debt; those purchases are nearing completion, and the remaining transactions will be executed by the end of this month. The Committee will continue to monitor the economic outlook and financial developments and will employ its policy tools as necessary to promote economic recovery and price stability.
In light of improved functioning of financial markets, the Federal Reserve has been closing the special liquidity facilities that it created to support markets during the crisis. The only remaining such program, the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, is scheduled to close on June 30 for loans backed by new-issue commercial mortgage-backed securities and on March 31 for loans backed by all other types of collateral.
Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; James Bullard; Elizabeth A. Duke; Donald L. Kohn; Sandra Pianalto; Eric S. Rosengren; Daniel K. Tarullo; and Kevin M. Warsh. Voting against the policy action was Thomas M. Hoenig, who believed that continuing to express the expectation of exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period was no longer warranted because it could lead to the buildup of financial imbalances and increase risks to longer-run macroeconomic and financial stability.